n8n vs Make (Integromat): Which Should You Choose?

Last updated June 12, 2026

Quick Verdict

Choose n8n if you want self-hosting, code steps, and flat per-execution pricing — it's the engineer's pick and the cheapest at scale. Choose Make if you want a polished managed cloud with more prebuilt apps and a gentler path for semi-technical builders who don't want to maintain anything.

Side-by-Side Comparison

Aspectn8nMake (Integromat)
PricingFreemium · from €24/mo
Free plan
Open source
API available
No signup required
Best forTechnical teams that outgrow Zapier-style tools
Platformsweb, api
Best forTechnical teams wanting control and low costSemi-technical builders in a managed cloud
HostingSelf-host free or n8n CloudCloud-only SaaS
Custom logicJavaScript/Python code nodes anywhereFunctions and tools, but no full code steps
Integrations400+ nodes plus generic HTTP2,000+ prebuilt apps
PricingPer execution — branches and loops includedPer operation — every module call counts
AI workflowsNative AI/LangChain agent nodesAI modules and an assistant, less agent-centric
n8n logo

n8n

Source-available workflow automation that combines visual building with custom code and AI agents.

n8n is a workflow automation platform built for technical teams that want the speed of no-code without giving up the flexibility of code. You build automations on a visual canvas by connecting nodes for over 400 apps and services, and can drop into JavaScript or Python whenever a step needs custom logic. Its AI capabilities let you build agents whose reasoning is traceable step by step on the canvas, making it a popular choice for RAG pipelines, IT operations, security automation, and lead workflows. Because the source is available and the platform is self-hostable, teams with strict data requirements can run n8n entirely on their own infrastructure, while n8n Cloud offers a managed option. With one of the most popular repositories on GitHub, the community contributes thousands of ready-made workflow templates.

Pros

  • Self-hostable, so sensitive data never has to leave your infrastructure
  • Fair-code license with a free community edition for self-hosting
  • Far more flexible than typical no-code tools thanks to code steps

Cons

  • Steeper learning curve than consumer automation tools like Zapier
  • Cloud plans meter workflow executions, which can need planning at scale
Make (Integromat) logo

Make (Integromat)

Advanced automation platform for connecting apps and automating workflows with visual scenario building.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, n8n or Make (Integromat)?

Choose n8n if you want self-hosting, code steps, and flat per-execution pricing — it's the engineer's pick and the cheapest at scale. Choose Make if you want a polished managed cloud with more prebuilt apps and a gentler path for semi-technical builders who don't want to maintain anything.

Do n8n and Make (Integromat) have free plans?

n8n offers a free plan, while Make (Integromat) does not currently advertise one.

Is n8n or Make (Integromat) open source?

n8n is open source; Make (Integromat) is a closed-source product.